Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Thomas et al v. Posluszny
as 3:2017cv00536
Plaintiff:
Phillip L. Thomas and Kristine N. Thomas
Defendant:
Edward F. Posluszny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv02913
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Thomas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2016cv02662
Plaintiff:
Carrie L Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thomas v. Ohio State of et al
as 1:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Marcos L. Thomas, Sr.
Defendant:
Ohio State of, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Reisch et al
as 5:2014cv01417
Plaintiff:
Barry L Thomas
Defendant:
Stephen A Reisch, Barry Lynn Thomas, John G Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Reisch et al
as 5:2014cv01372
Plaintiff:
Barry L Thomas
Defendant:
Stephen Reisch, John G Haas, Victor A George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20248
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Thomas
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gamel et al v. Cincinnati, City of et al
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Gamel, Sr., Donald C. Beets, Kevin A. Shepard and others
Defendant:
Cincinnati, City of, Mark Mallory, Cecil L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomas v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 4:2009cv01567
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. Thomas
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Elyria Jail, Mahoning County Correction Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
