Cases 11 - 20 of 22
FINNEMEN v. MURTHA et al
as 1:2018cv01794
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
KRISTINA G. MURTHA, GILBERT L. WILSON, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08616
Plaintiff:
JASON L. WILSON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv03182
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and ABC CORPORATION 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILSON v. ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01911
Plaintiff:
DONLAD L WILSON
Defendant:
ZIMMER, INC. , ZIMMER US, INC. and ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. PASSAIC COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2012cv04434
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. WILSON
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY JAIL, CORIZON-MEDICAL DEPT. and GOURMET KITCHEN ARMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSI v. ZICKEFOOSE et al
as 1:2010cv04802
Plaintiff:
MANSA MUSA MASSI
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, J. L. NORWOOD, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2009cv04432
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. WILSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and RUBY J. WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. GOOD et al
as 1:2009cv04164
Plaintiff:
KYLE POWELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL GOOD, S. CRAWFORD, M. MAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ORRO et al
as 3:2009cv02701
Plaintiff:
ANTWON L. WILSON
Defendant:
ROBERT ORRO and CHRIS SHARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON et al v. MENU FOODS LIMITED
as 1:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
LORI L. WILSON, DONALD STIMMEL, DELORES STIMMEL and others
Defendant:
MENU FOODS LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
