Cases 11 - 20 of 36
DOE v. GATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE
Defendant:
GATEWAY REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Meighan v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv05138
Plaintiff:
Diana Meighan
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE COMMISSIONER DANIELLE OUTLAW, P.O. Tucker, Badge No. 2471 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ONYIAH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01556
Plaintiff:
OBINA ONYIAH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER COMMISSIONER CHARLES RAMSEY, POLICE CAPT./LT. JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BREWER v. SHEA et al
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
DONTE BREWER
Defendant:
K. SHEA, LIEUTENANT ROHAL, SERGEANT PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EL v. MATSON et al
as 2:2021cv01325
Plaintiff:
RYSHEIRD MALIK EL, RYSHEID MALIK EX REL BALDWIN and RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
NICHOLAS MATSON, JEFFEY GRANTZ, GEORGE LOWTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRENKE v. HOWSARE et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
SHAWN GRENKE
Defendant:
ERIN HOWSARE, DENNIS VOUGHT, VARSHA PANDYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
ELI DAVIS
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDEN SAWTELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUXTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
ANDY BUXTON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MELINDA ADAMS, KAREN FEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEMMONS v. DOE et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
VICTOR K. LEMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE and LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00599
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN WETZEL, KARAN FEATHER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NEAL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
