Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Gangle v. Givens et al
as 6:2016cv01372
Plaintiff:
Norman Clark Gangle
Defendant:
Givens, Coburn, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Davis et al
as 5:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
Christopher Campbell
Defendant:
Christeen Davis, Jerry Lovelace, Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Lovelace
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Dr. Peasants and Hugh Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jason Jermaine Hall
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Cam Ward, Mike Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Corizon Medical et al
as 6:2014cv01890
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Welch
Defendant:
Corizon Medical and Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippen v. Bentley et al
as 6:2014cv01787
Plaintiff:
Samuel Pippen
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Freddie Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson et al v. Community Health Systems Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01620
Defendant:
Gadsden Regional Physician Group Practice LLC, Foley Hospital Corporation, Anniston HMA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia K Horgan, Joel Lovelace, Joshua Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 6:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
William Andrew Myers
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Jerry Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lashun Harrison
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Gwendolyn Mosely, Joseph Womble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
