Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Martin v. Luhr Bros., Inc.
as 3:2015cv00857
Defendant:
Luhr Bros., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travis Martin
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
United States of America for the Use of Luhr Bros., Inc. v. National Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use of Luhr Bros., Inc.
Defendant:
National Services, Inc. and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Abadie v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Abadie
Defendant:
United States of America, Bean Dredging, LLC, Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
United States of America for the Use of Luhr Bros, Inc. v. K&K Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use of Luhr Bros, Inc.
Defendant:
K&K Industries, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Meador v. Luhr Bros Inc
as 3:2014cv01285
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Meador
Defendant:
Luhr Bros Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Terry McCurter v. Luhr Bros., Inc.
as 13-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY R. MCCURTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LUHR BROS., INC.
Terry McCurter v. Luhr Bros., Inc.
as 13-1848
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERRY R. MCCURTER
Defendant - Appellant:
LUHR BROS., INC.
McCurter v. Luhr Bros Inc
as 3:2011cv00011
Plaintiff:
Terry R. McCurter
Defendant:
Luhr Bros Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Bollinger Shipyards, Inc./Bollinger Algiers, L.L.C. v. Luhr Bros., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02455
Plaintiff:
Bollinger Shipyards, Inc./Bollinger Algiers, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Luhr Bros., Inc. and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Bollinger Shipyards, Inc./Bollinger Algiers, L.L.C. v. Luhr Bros., Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02456
Plaintiff:
Bollinger Shipyards, Inc./Bollinger Algiers, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Luhr Bros., Inc. and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
