Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Karner, et al v. MGT Capital Investments, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv07423
Defendant:
MGT Capital Investments, Inc. and Robert B. Ladd
Plaintiff:
Kurt Karner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gioia Systems, LLC v. MGT Cpaital Investments, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03148
Plaintiff:
Gioia Systems, LLC
Defendant:
MGT Cpaital Investments, Inc., Robert Ladd, Robert Traversa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ladd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Alan Ladd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Euchner-USA, Inc. et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2012cv00604
Plaintiff:
Euchner-USA, Inc. , Michael Ladd and Euchner-USA, Inc. 401-K Plan
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Ladd v. Merck & Co.,Inc.
as 1:2010cv00648
Plaintiff:
Diana Ladd
Defendant:
Merck & Co.,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ladd v. Bradt
as 6:2008cv06025
Petitioner:
Thomas Ladd
Respondent:
Mark L. Bradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ladd et al v. Liverpool Central School District et al
as 5:2007cv01339
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Ladd and George Mangicaro
Defendant:
Liverpool Central School District, Liverpool Central School District Board of Education and Janice Matousek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sherrill et al v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2005cv06537
Plaintiff:
Margarita Sherrill, Tony Falso, Jon Stewart and others
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc. and The Sutherland Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
