Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Rutkauskas v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv03064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rutkauskas
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Ray Holt, J.A. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Haynes et al
as 2:2011cv00079
Petitioner:
Michael Antrantrino Lee
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes and Harley G. Lappins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Halsey v. Acker et al
as 1:2011cv01530
Plaintiff:
Thomas Halsey, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Acker, Harley G. Lappin, Anthony Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Holder et al
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jose Ernesto Perez Morales
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Harley G. Lappin, James E. Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurston v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and H. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Iglesias v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2010cv02357
Plaintiff:
Erick Guillermo Valle Iglesias
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guzman v. Holder et al
as 3:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Rojas Guzman
Defendant:
Erick Holder, Harley G. Lappin, James E. Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv03458
Petitioner:
Sammy McCray
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and Grayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
Butler v. Grayer et al
as 1:2009cv03416
Petitioner:
Adam Butler, II
Respondent:
Grayer and Harry Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
Thurston v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
