Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv03021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Xue et al v. J&B Spartanburg LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
Yong Le Xue , Xing Long Luo and Yong Jun Fu
Defendant:
J&B Spartanburg LLC, Wai Leung Sim, Zhi Jie Shao and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hankins et al v. Electric-Rooterman and Handyman Inc et al
as 7:2014cv04094
Plaintiff:
Frederick Hankins and David Seegars
Defendant:
Electric-Rooterman and Handyman Inc, Drain Doctor-Electric Man Inc, Raye Le Construction and Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eble v. Le Pingouin et al
as 2:2011cv03282
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Eble
Defendant:
Van Liew Ventures Inc and Le Pingouin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Stewart v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 2:2011cv03020
Plaintiff:
Deborah Stewart
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Les Jordan, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Galeucia et al v. West Paces Hotel Group LLC, The et al
as 9:2011cv00670
Plaintiff:
Craig Galeucia , Ron Gwyn , David Habberstad and others
Defendant:
West Paces Hotel Group LLC, The , WPHG Daufuskie Human Resources LLC , William R Dixon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
