Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Ell Jones v. USDC-CASAC
as 10-73250
:
In re: ELL JONES
Petitioner:
ELL JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
M. KNOWLES and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sy Castle v. M. Knowles, et al
as 10-16372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SY LEE CASTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. KNOWLES, Warden, R. FISHER, Captain, PHILLIPS, Lieutentant and others
LeGrante Ellis v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-16145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEGRANTE V. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, P. ENRIQUEZ, Facility Captain, NORTH KERN STATE PRISON and others
Timothy Denton v. M. Knowle
as 10-16095
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY M. DENTON
Respondent - Appellee:
M. KNOWLES, Warden
Ford v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2010at00286
Plaintiff:
Ray Byron Ford
Defendant:
A. Hedgpeth , California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , M Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heilman, et al v. Cate, et al
as 2:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman, Stephen R Williamson, George Lee and others
Defendant:
Joe McGrath , Michael Cry , W Sinkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heilman et al v. West et al
as 2:2010at00425
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Heilman, Stephen R Williamson, George Lee and others
Defendant:
Joe McGrath , Michael Cry , W Sinkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Esli Alvarez v. M Knowle
as 10-55472
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESLI JOEL ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
M KNOWLES, Warden
McKinney v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
Gregory McKinney
Defendant:
S. Hubbard, M. Knowles, N. Dill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. Martel, et al,
as 2:2009cv03024
Plaintiff:
James Edward Dailey
Defendant:
Michael Martel, William Knipp, Richard Laituri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
