Cases 11 - 20 of 124
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. 1224 Construction Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
1224 Construction Inc., Anna M. Johnson, Crown Home Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PC) Lipscomb v. Olivas et al
as 1:2021cv01127
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lipscomb
Defendant:
T. Olivas, M. Johnson and G. Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marianne Afifi et al v. Cambria Community Services District et al
as 2:2021cv05080
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brown, Meagan Christiansen, David M. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Cambria Community Services District and County of San Luis Obispo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Government App Solutions, Inc. v. FBI, et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Gregory J. Stanton, Michael Tubbs, Andrea Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Government App Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
(PC) Farha v. Foss, et al.
as 1:2020cv01549
Defendant:
J. Frailey, R. St-Andre, J Farley and others
Plaintiff:
Mauwai Farha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 4:2020cv07703
Defendant:
E. Vehbe, Michall R. Smyth, G. Marlon and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv07728
Defendant:
Michael D. Capellas, Cisco Systems, Inc., Mark Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Farha v. Foss, et al.
as 2:2020cv02206
Defendant:
J. Frailey, R. St-Andre, J Farley and others
Plaintiff:
Mauwai Farha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey et al v. People Republic of China et al
as 4:2020cv07344
Defendant:
National Health Commission of the People Republic of China, Shi Zhengli, People Liberation Army and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Kenneth Stuckey, Anthony Grisby, M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
