Cases 11 - 20 of 246
M S International, Inc. v. FQI Charlotte LLC et al
as 8:2021cv00939
Plaintiff:
M S International, an Indiana corporation and M S International, Inc.
Defendant:
FQI Charlotte dba First Quality Interiors, a North Carolina limited liability company, Chris J. Loucy, Christine L Loucy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01690
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
William Sardi et al v. Dorothy Carfrae et al
as 2:2020cv10186
Defendant:
Doreen Boxer, Shannon Payne and Dorothy Carfrae
Plaintiff:
M. S. and William Sardi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,et al
as 3:2020cv07276
Plaintiff:
ALLISON D. SALAZAR, LINDA J. THOMAS, CLYDE STEPHENS and others
Defendant:
SAFEWAY, INC, PFIZER INC., INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS DOE 4, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS DOE 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez et al
as 3:2020cv06927
Plaintiff:
M. S., a minor and Luz Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P. et al v. Shutterfly, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04960
Plaintiff:
R. P., Eunice Morris, Y. S. and others
Defendant:
SHUTTERFLY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Jane Doe, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2020cv02748
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE and M. S.
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01274
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
