Cases 11 - 20 of 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bryant v. Marion County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lamar Bryant
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff, Billy Woods and FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean v. Marion County Courts et al
as 5:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Richard L Jean
Defendant:
Marion County Courts, Marion County Sheriffs Department and Marion County Real Estate Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Michele Johnson
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stephens
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stephens
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Marion County Sheriff's Office and Staff
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hopkins
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Office and Staff and Heart of Florida Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
