Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-830
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennett and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2023cv06249
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
William A. Fletcher and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 22-16855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara, JOHN CHASE, Deputy District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. USDC-CASJ
as 23-70016
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, JEFFREY F. ROSEN, District Attorney, County of Santa Clara and others
Petitioner:
KUANG-BAO OU-YOUNG
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
