Cases 11 - 20 of 6,369
Abbink v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv05426
Plaintiff:
Marc Abbink
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv05403
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Diane Jordan
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Renard Robinson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Perea v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dav Perea
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(PC) Hasha v. Gamboa, et al.
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Robin L. Hasha
Defendant:
Martin Gamboa, Cecillo Velasco, Lacy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downing v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Eileen Downing
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NnaDozie Dike v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv05394
Plaintiff:
NanDozie Dike
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Martin Contreras, Roxanne B. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johns v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen Johns
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kitchen v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv03740
Plaintiff:
Erica Jean Kitchen
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Richardson
as 5:2024cv03734
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
