Cases 11 - 20 of 654
Brown v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Pang v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jillian Pang
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. SAP/SAPNS2
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Folake Martin
Defendant:
SAP/SAPNS2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wright v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wright v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Slack v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Rachel Slack
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Ellis v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Shawntelle Ellis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sissoko v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Vivian Sissoko, o/b/o S.E.S, a minor
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
