Cases 11 - 20 of 368
Morales v. Burns et al
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Francisco Morales III and Francisco Morales, III
Defendant:
Maurice L. Burns and Crete Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SPFM L.P. v. Salama et al
as 5:2023cv01291
Defendant:
Edward Salama, Henry Salama, Maurice Salama and others
Plaintiff:
SPFM L.P. doing business as Ritter Dental USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Doss v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01777
Petitioner:
Maurice Lamar Doss
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Walker v. Garcia et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Detective Mark Garcia, District Attorney Brian Goertz, Valarie Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disiere v. Warden, Estelle Unit
as 1:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Maurice Disiere
Respondent:
Warden, Estelle Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Harris County Detention
as 4:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Harris County Detention
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Puntes et al
as 9:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Maurice Deman Hall
Defendant:
Johna V. Puntes and Jennifer J. Shackelford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
