Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Womack et al v. Murray
as 5:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Shanita Denise Womack and Nikita Goffney, SR
Defendant:
Owen J Murray, David J Baker, Linda K Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hernandez v. UTMB Galveston
as 22-20323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ruben Hernandez
Defendant / Appellee:
UTMB Galveston Hospital, UTMB Galveston Hospital Staff, Dr. Michael Britt, Medical Doctor and others
Jerrels v. Deadner et al
as 5:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
William Jerrels
Defendant:
Krystal M. Deadner, FNU Duncan, Christopher Purdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01797
Petitioner:
KEYION M. LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOBBY LUMPKIN, JR., MICHAEL BRITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Britt
as 3:2022cv01163
Petitioner:
Nathan Javon Scott
Respondent:
Michael Britt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prescott v. Johnson
as 22-40255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant / Appellee:
K. Johnson, Kitchen Manager, Gurney Unit, Tony A. Dean, Officer, Coffield Unit, Stuart Calhoun, Warden, Gurney Unit and others
Mann v. Nations, et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mann
Defendant:
Samuel Nations, JANICE BRIGANCE, VALENTWERP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santelises v. Britt
as 5:2021cv00598
Respondent:
Michael Britt
Petitioner:
Cesar Santelises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerard v. Temple et al
as 5:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Paige N Temple and Michael Britt
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Polk et al
as 4:2021cv00602
Respondent:
Michael N. Bates, Balden B Polk, Ralston D Marshall and others
Petitioner:
James Edward Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
