Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Ramsey v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2017cv08062
Plaintiff:
Jay David Ramsey
Defendant:
Donovan Schmidt, Correct Care Solutions, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08041
Plaintiff:
David John Peacock
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Michael Linderman, Ron Credio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Linderman et al
as 4:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
JD Merrick
Defendant:
Michael Linderman, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrick v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00820
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Michael Linderman and Marion Kidwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson #117045 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01095
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, GEO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Ryan et al
as 4:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kieth Jones
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Michael Linderman, Theresa Schroder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bomar #101907 v. Linderman et al
as 2:2013cv00253
Defendant:
Michael Linderman, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Cluff and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Jermall Bomar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood #062887 v. Linderman et al
as 2:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Frank Jarvis Atwood
Defendant:
Michael Linderman and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson #117045 v. Ulibari et al
as 2:2012cv02163
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
B Ulibari, D Arroyo, Unknown Kuger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Addis v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv02005
Plaintiff:
Gary J Addis
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Michael Linderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
