Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Ybarra v. Wells County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra
Defendant:
Wells County Jail, Monty Fisher, Karen Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT
Defendant:
JACKSON, JAMIE GREGORY, EK PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00002
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEATTY et al v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00170
Plaintiff:
LUCINDA BEATTY, THE ESTATE OF MONTY RAE BEATTY and RALPH BEATTY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Beatty et al v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ralph Beatty and Lucinda Beatty
Defendant:
United States of America
Estate_plaintiff:
Monty Rae Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2009mc00077
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAWN DESIREE CUMMINGS, FAZIA DEEN-BACCHUS, LISA MARIE DIRIG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
