Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 47
SPIVEY v. UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00173
Petitioner: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1590
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT
Defendant: SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellant: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Plaintiff: ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES, SAMUEL GAINES and others
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Warden David J. Ebbert, et al
as 20-1195
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN DAVID J. EBBERT and SEBAL
Plaintiff / Appellee: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH R. REID
Mandriez Spivey v. Monica Senn, et al
as 19-11585
Defendant / Appellee: GROVER MURRAY, PAMELA STEVENS, STEVEN ALBRYCHT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Mandriez Spivey v. Brian Owens, et al
as 19-11584
Defendant / Appellee: VICTORIA MALONE, BRIAN OWENS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
In re: Mandriez Spivey
as 19-10009
Petitioner: In re: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Undetermined: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SPIVEY v. DOE et al
as 1:2018cv00222
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Plaintiff: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spivey v. USA
as 5:2017cv00504
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reid et al v. Ebbert et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01403
Plaintiff: Kenneth R. Reid, Kareem Hassan Milhouse, Eric Houston and others
Defendant: J. Ebbert, Jeana Mitterling, M. Barner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Mandriez Spivey
as 16-12920
Petitioner: In re: MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?