Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Sullivan v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv05706
Petitioner:
Leroy Sullivan
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruitt v. Williams
as 4:2022cv04152
Petitioner:
Brian E Pruitt
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whatley v. Williams
as 1:2022cv03792
Petitioner:
Lamar Edward Whatley
Respondent:
Warden Williams and Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blakey v. Williams et al
as 4:2022cv04114
Plaintiff:
Carroll Blakey
Defendant:
Mark Williams, Kurt Osmundson, Kasey Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Matherly et al
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Fabian Santiago
Defendant:
Martin L Matherly, Jamar A Range, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Williams
as 3:2022cv50176
Petitioner:
Paul Keith Barksdale
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashenfelter v. Gosh et al
as 4:2022cv04059
Plaintiff:
Austin Ashenfelter
Defendant:
Partha Gosh, Chase Wilhelm, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purnell v. Williams
as 2:2022cv02060
Petitioner:
Melvin L Purnell
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyson v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01999
Petitioner:
Andre Tyson
Respondent:
Warden Mark Williams and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valadovinos v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01199
Petitioner:
Ignacio Valadovinos
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
