Cases 11 - 20 of 38
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MARQUIS PROPERTIES LLC et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Defendant:
RICHARD CLATFELTER, CHAD DEUCHER, JESSICA DEUCHER and others
Intervenor:
HODGES HOLDING LLC
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Receiver:
MARIA E. WINDHAM
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marquis Properties LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00003
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Marquis Properties LLC, Chad Deucher, Richard Clatfelter and others
Intervenor:
Hodges Holding LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
HICKS et al v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00416
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PINSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00401
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS HICKS, JONATHAN JONES and JEREMY PINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00398
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2016cv02759
Defendant:
PATRICK COLLINS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS LEWINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00381
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00385
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00384
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HICKS v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00388
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
