Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Dubose v. D'Emic et al
as 1:2017cv06938
Defendant:
Hon Mathew D'Emic, Honorable Martin Murphy and Robert Peck
Plaintiff:
Jerrold Dubose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddy v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2017cv08960
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Gaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White et al v. Dortch et al
as 1:2017cv07266
Plaintiff:
Erik White, Tamarsha Battice, Lanette Davis and others
Defendant:
Tamika Dortch, Kenneth M. Perry, Esq, George B. Lewis, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Murphy
as 1:2017cv05852
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Henry
Respondent:
Martin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Henry v. Miccoli et al
as 1:2017cv04420
Defendant:
Joseph Freebern, Vincent Miccoli, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henry v. Murphy
as 1:2016cv05421
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Henry
Respondent:
Martin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vassallo v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv07125
Plaintiff:
Frank Vassallo
Defendant:
City of New York , Corizon Health, Inc. , Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faltine et al v. Murphy et al
as 1:2015cv03961
Defendant:
Elizabeth Calcatera, Lanza Maximili, Martin Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Kiama Faltine and Kijafa Faltine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv02157
Plaintiff:
Timothy Collier
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Foertsch, Haytham Mohammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fastsigns International Inc v. MCM USA Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00717
Plaintiff:
Fastsigns International Inc
Defendant:
MCM USA Inc, Bob A. Massey, Nenette Cajucom Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
