Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Teen v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00568
Plaintiff:
Antrell Teen
Defendant:
R. Smith, Germaine, Zante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Moore v. Scott, et al
as 3:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Scott, Steven Strubberg, Shane Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross et al v. McLaurin et al
as 3:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Cedric Cross, Larry Williams, Daniel Pippins and others
Defendant:
Phillip McLaurin, St. Clair County Jail, St. Clair County Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boisselle et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09168
Plaintiff:
Christopher Boisselle , Mari-Elena Davis and Lief Doezema
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. , Volkswagen AG, Audi of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gillum v. Aramark Food Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00810
Plaintiff:
Cortez D Gillum
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Inc. and Mary Robinson-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillum v. Watson et al
as 3:2014cv00546
Plaintiff:
Cortez D Gillum
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Thomas T Trice, Debra Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Board of Education of Peoria Public School District No. 150
as 1:2012cv01051
Plaintiff:
Mary C Davis
Defendant:
The Board of Education of Peoria Public School District No. 150
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrigan et al v. Midland Credit Management, Inc,
as 1:2009cv03110
Plaintiff:
Carmella A. Garrigan, Carmella A. Garrigan, Diane Anderson and others
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
