Cases filed in Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
IFS Coatings, Inc. v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00378
Plaintiff: IFS Coatings, Inc.
Defendant: Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. v. FlexTM, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00248
Defendant: FlexTM, Inc.
Plaintiff: Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Walgreen Co
as 4:2014cv02761
Plaintiff: Henry Adams , Worvell Ray Aldridge , Harry Aubrey, Jr. and others
Defendant: Walgreen Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vapor Point LLC et al v. Moorhead et al
as 4:2011cv04639
Plaintiff: Vapor Point LLC , Keith Nathan and Kenneth Matheson
Defendant: Elliott Moorhead and NanoVapor Fuels Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matheson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00159
Petitioner: Kenney Lee Matheson
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Driver v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 3:2009mc00057
Plaintiff: Amy Driver
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, Doreen Hudson, Yvette Sanchez-Owens and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01451
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02291
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Acetylene Oxygen Co. v. Matheson Tri-Gas Inc
as 1:2007cv00204
Plaintiff: Acetylene Oxygen Co.
Defendant: Matheson Tri-Gas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Strother v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00242
Plaintiff: J Francis Strother and J Francis Strother
Defendant: Goodrich Corporation, Goodrich Corporation, U S Rubber Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?