Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Thomas v. City of Berkeley, Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Bruce Thomas
Defendant:
City of Berkeley, Missouri, Frank McCall, Antwan Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01669
Plaintiff:
Susan Richardson , Tracy Robinson , Jeff Robinson and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harding et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01648
Plaintiff:
Nicky Harding , Nancy Mackinnon , Pius Nwinee and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv06082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv06083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McCall v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv04277
Plaintiff:
Tamara McCall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCall v. Disabled American Veterans, Ernestine Schumann-Heink Missouri Chapter 2 et al
as 4:2011cv01298
Defendant:
Disabled American Veterans, Ernestine Schumann-Heink Missouri Chapter 2 , Red Racks Thrift Store, LLC , Douglas DePew and others
Plaintiff:
Birdell McCall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCall v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv03359
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCall v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv03138
Plaintiff:
Barbara G. McCall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
