Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Clarence Thomas v. Michael McCoy, et al
as 14-2032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY, BRIAN ASBELL, BRENT CHRISTIAN and others
Lionel Robinson v. Michael McCoy, et al
as 14-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONEL D. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY, JOSEPH M. NEEDHAM, BRIAN ASBELL and others
Stephen Foulks v. Michael McCoy, et al
as 13-3879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN FOULKS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL D. MCCOY, DOCTOR WEINSTEIN, PATRICIA MATTUS and others
Purdle et al v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv01269
Plaintiff:
Timothy Purdle, David Buford, Antoine Sims and others
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Rob McCoy, Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Antoine Sims
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham, Brian L Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minor v. County of Peoria et al
as 1:2013cv01159
Plaintiff:
Tommy Minor
Defendant:
County of Peoria, Michael D McCoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacey v. Peoria County Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv01051
Defendant:
Peoria County Illinois, City of Peoria, Illinois, Michael D McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Stacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Macklin v. McCoy et al
as 1:2013cv01018
Plaintiff:
Ahmad R. Macklin
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham and Brian L Asbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. McCoy et al
as 1:2012cv01519
Plaintiff:
Lionel D'Angelo Robinson
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham, Brian L Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. McCoy et al
as 1:2012cv01201
Plaintiff:
George Martin
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham, . Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
