Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Michael Kim v. USA
as 21-10451
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, MARY STENSON SCRIVEN, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KIM, an individual
Kim v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv03041
Defendant:
Hunter Carroll, Ashley Moody, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim v. The Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 8:2020cv02934
Defendant:
Hunter W. Carroll, Mark S. Miller, Westwater Construction, Inc., A Florida Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kim v. United States of America et al
as 8:2020cv02791
Defendant:
Lisa M. Castellano, Westwater Construction, Inc., Mark S. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jung Won Yun v. Chung Cha Kim et al
as 5:2020cv02266
Petitioner:
Jung Won Yun
Respondent:
Michael Kim, Chung Cha Kim and Monica Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green World Council Bluffs LLC et al v. 1Sharpe Opportunity Intermediate Fund LP et al
as 2:2020cv01579
Defendant:
Travis Masters, Derrick Land, Churchill Real Estate Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim and Green World Council Bluffs LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020mc00086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
In re: Trail Management, et al
as 20-13197
Petitioner:
In re: TRAIL MANAGEMENT and MICHAEL KIM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
