Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Lovelace v. Sheriff Victor Hill
as 1:2020cv02552
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Sammut v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Sammut, HD and Michael P. Sammut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Phillips v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2020cv00675
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Phillips
Defendant:
La'Quandra L. Smith and Michael P. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Taylor
as 4:2019cv00316
Respondent:
Warden Cedric Taylor
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Michael P. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lovelace v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04931
Defendant:
Clayton County, State of Georgia and Scott & Turner Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv04804
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Lovelace, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
General Produce LLC v. Nature's Garden Express, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01059
Defendant:
Scott L. Frishman, Nature's Garden Express, LLC and Michael P. Kirk
Plaintiff:
General Produce LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
BOUIE v. Altman et al
as 7:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE TERRELL BOUIE
Defendant:
HARRY JAY ALTMAN, II, THOMASVILLE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and MICHAEL P BOGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Ray et al
as 1:2018cv01765
Plaintiff:
Leroy A. James
Defendant:
Walter Sen Ray, Jr., Bobby Kenneth Whitworth, Garfield A. Hammonds, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
