Cases filed in Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Albergaria v. Windsor et al
as 5:2015cv01144
Plaintiff: Diane A Albergaria
Defendant: Mr. Erik Balboa, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Mr. Michael Todd Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company v. Windsor et al
as 5:2015cv01143
Defendant: Erik Balboa, United States Of America and Michael Todd Windsor
Plaintiff: Colonial County Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Atkinson v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01413
Petitioner: Michael Todd Atkinson
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Norwood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2010cv00005
Plaintiff: Michael Todd Jones
Defendant: Tommy Norwood, Candace Tucker and David Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sackett v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2009cv00648
Plaintiff: Michael Todd Sackett
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00166
Petitioner: Michael Todd Jones
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allen v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00454
Petitioner: Michael Todd Allen
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wade v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00361
Petitioner: Michael Todd Wade
Respondent: Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2007cv00093
Petitioner: Michael Todd Jones
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Quarterman
as 6:2007cv00066
Petitioner: Michael Todd Wade
Respondent: Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?