Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Blakesley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan et al
as 2:2019cv10295
Plaintiff:
Raymond Blakesley
Defendant:
William McMullen, DEA US Drug Enforcement Administration, Michigan State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakesley v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10299
Defendant:
Monroe County Circuit Court, Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen and others
Plaintiff:
Renay Blakesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cook v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv10135
Defendant:
Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. William et al
as 2:2019cv10125
Defendant:
Carl Christensen, MD, William McMullen, Michigan State Police and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haugh v. Monroe, City of et al
as 2:2017cv10934
Plaintiff:
Linda Haugh
Defendant:
Monroe, City of , Charles F McCormick, IV , Brace Timmins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Peterson v. Clanton, et al
as 5:2016cv10353
Plaintiff:
Bradley T. Peterson
Defendant:
Daniel Clanton, Monroe, City of, Monroe Police Department and others
Dog Pound, LLC, The v. Monroe, City of
as 2:2009cv13104
Plaintiff:
Dog Pound, LLC, The
Defendant:
Monroe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Hall v. Tolstedt et al
as 2:2009cv11694
Plaintiff:
Stacey Simeon Hall
Defendant:
Chad Tolstedt, Daryl Tamsen, Don Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Orozco v. Monroe, City of
as 5:2008cv13810
Plaintiff:
Jose Orozco
Defendant:
Monroe, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Tolstedt et al
as 2:2007cv13223
Plaintiff:
Stacey Hall
Defendant:
Chad Tolstedt, Daryl Tamsen, Don Brady and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
