Cases 11 - 16 of 16
HB Rowe Company Incorporated v. W. Tippett
as 09-1050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HB ROWE COMPANY INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
W. LYNDO TIPPETT, individually, P. E. LEN A. SANDERSON, individually, J. G. NANCE, in his official capacity as Chief Engineer-Operations of the North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC.
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 1:2007cv03378
Plaintiff:
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Martin, Harold v. DOJ, et al
as 05-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harold Martin
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, J. Steve Hinkle, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project, American Civil Liberties Union of the National Captial Area and NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 04-5157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Veneman, Ann, et al
as 02-5021
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
National Congress of American Indians, ("NCAI"), The Lawyer'Committee for Civil Rights and NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
:
, , and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 00-5138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
