Cases 11 - 20 of 113
HARRIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
JORGE HARRIS
Defendant:
KRIEG WILLIAMS, NANCY GIROUX, MELINDA L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TEJADA v. ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, AT NO. CR-2407-2015, ET AL
as 1:2016cv00026
Petitioner:
RICKY TEJADA
Respondent:
ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, AT NO. CR-2407-2015, ET AL, KATHLEEN KANE and NANCY GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRICE v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2016cv00117
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PRICE
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HELSEL v. GIROUX et al
as 3:2016cv00010
Petitioner:
DAVID A. HELSEL
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BESS v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2016cv00033
Petitioner:
SHANNON BESS
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Giroux et al
as 4:2015cv02431
Petitioner:
Sade Stewart
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACOBS v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv01656
Petitioner:
ANDRE JACOBS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIEGEL v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2015cv00297
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
STEVEN SIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleary v. Giroux et al
as 3:2015cv02355
Petitioner:
William Cleary
Respondent:
Nancy Giroux and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2015cv00293
Petitioner:
TROY L. ADAMS
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
