Cases 11 - 20 of 552
Verma et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv01158
Petitioner:
Neal Verma and Amitha Verma
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Tidwell, et al
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Cedric Thompson
Defendant:
John Tidwell, Bowie County, Texas, Bowie County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokey v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Bobby Neal Stokey
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, NewRez, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Neal v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
as 3:2023cv02530
Plaintiff:
Jack James Neal
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc doing business as Hobby Lobby, Thibodo Management Co Inc and GRT Properties I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Neal et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Torin Smith
Defendant:
Jeff Neal, Turn Key Medical, Bowie County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige v. Cooperstone et al
as 4:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
Ambreia Paige
Defendant:
Ryan Neal Cooperstone and Melissa Cooperstone
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Conroy v. Shell USA
as 3:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Neal Conroy
Defendant:
Shell USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
