Cases 11 - 20 of 556
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criswell et al v. Frost Bank
as 5:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Lanita Criswell and Lasheena Neal
Defendant:
Frost Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hargrave v. Moreno
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jim Hargrave, Jimmy Neal Hargrave and Jimmy Neal Younker
Defendant:
NFN Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verma et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv01158
Petitioner:
Neal Verma and Amitha Verma
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Tidwell, et al
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Cedric Thompson
Defendant:
John Tidwell, Bowie County, Texas, Bowie County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokey v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Bobby Neal Stokey
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, NewRez, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
