Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Nelson v. Lois Deberry Special Needs
as 3:2012mc00036
Plaintiff:
Oswald Urban Nelson
Defendant:
Lois Deberry Special Needs
Logan v. Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility
as 3:2012cv00330
Plaintiff:
James Logan
Defendant:
Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stack v. Deberry's Special Needs
as 1:2012cv01029
Petitioner:
Alfred A. Stack
Respondent:
Deberry's Special Needs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale et al v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2 et al
as 1:2011cv01188
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and Terry Eugene Atkins, Jr.
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2, Special Needs DeBerry and Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driver v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
De'Mario Driver
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Lois M Deberry Special Needs Facility, (f/n/u) Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 1:2010cv01302
Plaintiff:
Willie Hampton
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Toney, Louis DeBerry Special Needs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matdison G. Carter Special Needs Trust et al v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv00965
Plaintiff:
Matdison G. Carter Special Needs Trust, Matdison G. Carter Special Needs Trust, Matdison G. Carter Special Needs Trust and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williamson v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cecil R Williamson, Jr
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Medical Director, Northeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarten v. Deberry Special Needs Facility et al
as 3:2007cv00618
Plaintiff:
Avery E. Sarten
Defendant:
Deberry Special Needs Facility and Dave Sehrn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
