Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Williams v. Nish et al
as 1:2011cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Williams
Defendant:
Joseph P. Nish and Karen Rogers Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnakin v. Nish et al
as 1:2011cv00157
Petitioner:
Wayne A. Johnakin
Respondent:
Joseph P. Nish, The District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv05604
Plaintiff:
JOSH LEE ANDERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, DAVID A. VARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. NISH
as 2:2010cv04934
Petitioner:
ROBERT E. SIMMONS
Respondent:
NISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNAKIN v. NISH et al
as 2:2010cv01699
Petitioner:
WAYNE JOHNAKIN
Respondent:
JOSEPH P. NISH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Nish
as 3:2010cv00654
Petitioner:
Robert E Simmons
Respondent:
Nish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2010cv00584
Petitioner:
Eugene L Harrison
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Daniel Dragwa, Joseph Nish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Nish
as 1:2010cv00206
Petitioner:
George J. Taylor, III
Respondent:
Joseph P. Nish and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammond v. Nish et al
as 3:2010cv00069
Petitioner:
Desmond Hammond
Respondent:
Joseph P. Nish and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
