Cases 11 - 20 of 20
BUTT et al v. AMTRUST NP SFR VENTURE, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06364
Plaintiff:
WERNER BUTT and EUNICE BUTT
Defendant:
AMTRUST NP SFR VENTURE, LLC, MTGLQ INVESTORS L.P. , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and MTGLQ INVESTORS L.P.
Cross_defendant:
AMTRUST NP SFR VENTURE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
HOLMES v. VALENTINO et al
as 1:2014cv02093
Plaintiff:
MAJOR HOLMES
Defendant:
LAURIE VALENTINO, RN and MONICA TSAKIRIS, NP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLUMBIE v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2013cv06236
Plaintiff:
LUIS COLUMBIE
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN GODINSKY, MD, DIANE BOESE, OPT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GLAZEWSKI v. CORZINE et al
as 2:2007cv03685
Plaintiff:
VICNET W GLAZEWSKI
Defendant:
JON CORZINE, GEORGE HAYMAN, JAMES F. BARBO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
