Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Howell v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00373
Plaintiff:
Karla Howell
Defendant:
Matthew Collini, NaphCare, Inc., Pierette Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson, Jr. v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Randall Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Mills, Pamela Mitchell, R.N., Montgomery County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Hamilton County, Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv00724
Plaintiff:
Lisa Britt
Defendant:
Hamilton County, NaphCare, Inc., Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pate-Strickland v. Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Marsha Pate-Strickland
Defendant:
Montgomery County Board of Commissioners , Phil Plummer , David E Stemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Klein
Defendant:
Hamilton County, NaphCare, Inc, Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. DeLong et al
as 3:2016cv00437
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Day
Defendant:
Kim DeLong, Officer Wagner, City of Trotwood, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Martie Clark et al v. Sickman et al
as 1:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sickman , Linda Clark , Mark Forrester and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County of, Greg Hartmann, Chris Monzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beyoglides v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2014cv00158
Plaintiff:
Harry G Beyoglides, Jr
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff, NaphCare, Inc., Ted Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr vs Hrebkino, et al.
as 4:2014cv00966
Plaintiff:
Dennis Orr
Defendant:
Ronald L Hrebinko, Jr., M.D. and NaphCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacConnell v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Rion T MacConnell
Defendant:
Phil Plummer, NaphCare Inc, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
