Cases 11 - 20 of 639
Lobo Miller v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00459
Petitioner:
Eric Wayne Lobo Miller
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2009cv01013
Plaintiff:
David M. Lopez
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Julie Morales, Elwood Puttnam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Quarterman
as 7:2009cv00121
Petitioner:
Christopher David Ryan
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leopoldo Lising v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 09-51003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEOPOLDO GALANG LISING
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL A. QUARTERMAN, MARY SHELLY, Warden, MONIKA LONG and others
Solomon v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00048
Petitioner:
Thomas Jefferson Solomon
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00802
Petitioner:
Freddie Lee Myles
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Roy Deshan Taylor
Defendant:
Nathaniel A Quarterman, Richard E Wathen, Kristi M Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klein v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00688
Petitioner:
Justin J. Klein
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minnfee v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00689
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00684
Petitioner:
Alexis Ramos
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
