Cases 1 - 10 of 639
Roy Taylor v. Nathaniel Quarterman, et al
as 11-10680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY DESHAN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL A. QUARTERMAN, Director, RICHARD E WATHEN, Warden, KRISTI M. PICKETT, Senior LVN Nurse and others
Roy Taylor v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director, et al
as 11-10651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY DESHAN TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL A. QUARTERMAN, Director, EDDIE HERNANDEZ, CO4, JASON KIRKLAND, CO5 and others
Jones v. Quarterman
as 11-2519
Petitioner:
Juan T. Jones
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Director TDCJ / CID
Dial v. Thaler
as 1:2011cv00059
Petitioner:
Diana Dial
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amir-Sharif v. Carranza et al
as 4:2010cv00083
Petitioner:
Lakeith Amir-Sharif
Respondent:
Warden Linda D. Carranza, Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman and Warden Frank Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00456
Petitioner:
Charlie Julius Gonzales
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dossett v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00455
Petitioner:
Mike E. Dossett, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director TDCJ/CID Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amir-Sharif v. Director TDCJ Nathaniel A. Quarterman et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, Oscar Mendoza, ., Tony Samaniego and others
Petitioner:
Lakeith Amir-Sharif
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Eric WL Miller
Defendant:
Nathaniel A Quarterman, Richard E Wathen, Alfred A Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
