Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner: Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor: Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
Biogenic CO2 Coalition v. EPA, et al
as 19-1185
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler and Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: Biogenic CO2 Coalition
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor: Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council, Natural Resources Defense Council and others
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1140
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner: American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor: State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, ACCURACY & RELIABILITY et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02313
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, ACCURACY & RELIABILITY , COALITION OF LABOR, AGRICULTURE & BUSINESS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY , PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-13776
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
National Association of Home Builders of the United States et al v. Perez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00009
Plaintiff: National Association of Home Builders of the United States , Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America , Oklahoma State Home Builders Association and others
Defendant: Thomas E Perez , David Michaels , Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BOOMER DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02225
Plaintiff: BOOMER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SKYWATCH GROUP, DAVIS CONTRACTING AND DEVELOPMENT, INXC. and others
Defendant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES v. INFORMA EXHIBITIONS U.S., CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE,
as 1:2016cv02185
Defendant: INFORMA EXHIBITIONS U.S., CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE, and INFORMA EXHIBITIONS U.S., CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE, INC.
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boomer Development, LLC et al v. National Association of Home Builders of the United States We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01414
Plaintiff: Boomer Development, LLC, Skywatch Group, Davis Contracting and Development, Inxc. and others
Defendant: National Association of Home Builders of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE REMODELIING INDUSTRY, INC.
as 1:2009cv01156
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES
Defendant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE REMODELIING INDUSTRY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?