Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
BICKHART v. CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv05651
Plaintiff: JOHN D. BICKHART
Defendant: CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY, THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE MEMBERS CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY AND ITS INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS, EDWARD CORYELL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hess Corporation v. Naughton Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00683
Plaintiff: Hess Corporation
Defendant: Naughton Energy Corporation, Mariette Naughton and Joe Naughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAUGHTON v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
as 2:2013cv06812
Plaintiff: MARIA NAUGHTON
Defendant: GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NAUGHTON v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv01311
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Plaintiff: LORRAINE NAUGHTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NAUGHTON v. WENEROWICZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00719
Petitioner: JAMES NAUGHTON
Respondent: MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NAUGHTEN v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2010cv02208
Petitioner: JAMES NAUGHTON
Respondent: MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Naughton Allen v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv00092
Plaintiff: Nancy J. Naughton Allen
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?