Cases 11 - 20 of 454
Rocco Leo Gaglioti v. Makemake Entertainment Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02239
Plaintiff:
Rocco Leo Gaglioti
Defendant:
Makemake Entertainment Inc., Nuyorican Productions, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Copeland v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Diana Copeland
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Lifetime Entertainment Services, LLC and A&E Television Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Korea CGM Members Association v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Korea CGM Members Association
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sepulvedablanco et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20240
Plaintiff:
Michael Sepulvedablanco and Marie Sepulvedablanco
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Andres Lopez, Rafael A Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Dr. Dre et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Neverland Rach, Wang Film Productions, Dr. Dre and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Harris v. Religion of Sports Media, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01862
Plaintiff:
William Harris doing business as William Harris Productions and William Harris individually doing business as William Harris Productions
Defendant:
Religion of Sports Media, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hara v. Netflix, Inc., et al.
as 23-3768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE HARA, formerly known as Vicky Vox
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., TITMOUSE, INC., LOL SEND, INC. and others
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 22-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF EAST ST. LOUIS, ILLINOIS
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., DISNEY PLATFORM DISTRIBUTION, INC., APPLE INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
