Cases 11 - 20 of 48
HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. McKoy et al
as 1:2017cv06340
Defendant:
James N. McKoy, Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc., Criminal Court of the City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Messier v. New Cenury Financial Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01891
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marconi Messier
Defendant:
New Century Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARSHALL et al
as 2:2015cv08013
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN P. MARSHALL, CHERYL MARSHALL, NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Rochelle Carmichael v. Pressler & Pressler LLP, et al
as 15-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE CARMICHAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESSLER & PRESSLER LLP, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT and others
In re: Perry William
as 15-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE CARMICHAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESSLER & PRESSLER LLP, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT and others
Guardiola v. New Century Financial Services, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Richard Guardiola
Defendant:
New Century Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
