Cases 11 - 19 of 19
KADYLAK v. BOROUGH OF MOUNT PLEASANT, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv01199
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. KADYLAK
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MOUNT PLEASANT, PENNSYLVANIA, STEPHEN OBER and TRAVIS SHANDOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OBER et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING et al
as 2:2009cv74675
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A OBER and LOIS OBER
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING and UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
OBER v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv62716
Plaintiff:
KENDALL OBER
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, OWENS CORNING, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PHARMACARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.L.C. v. OBER et al
as 2:2007cv01631
Plaintiff:
PHARMACARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.L.C.
Defendant:
EDWARD OBER and DONALD H. PALMIERI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
OBER v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65272
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. OBER, THOMAS W. OBER, THOMAS W. OBER and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OBER
as 2:2007cv00816
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KIM J. OBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ober v. Miller et al
as 1:2004cv01669
Plaintiff:
Captain Darrell Ober
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferey B. Miller , Lt. Colonel Ralph Periandi , Major Leonard McDonald and others
Amicu:
Joanna Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ober v. Evanko, et al
as 1:2001cv00084
Defendant:
Joseph Westcott, Hawthorne Conley, Thomas Coury and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell G. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
