Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Pace v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00309
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pace
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeremiah Nesbitt v. City Of Harvey et al
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Nesbitt
Defendant:
City Of Harvey, Thomas Kant, Unknown Harvey Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jamie B. Pace
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pace v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Roger Pace
Defendant:
USP Marion, Warden Sprout and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bowes-Northern v. Village of Phoenix et al
as 1:2021cv06595
Plaintiff:
Cathy Bowes and Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Village of Phoenix, Village of Dolton, Echo Joint Agreement and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Davis et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 1:2021cv06305
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis, Randy Duncan, Brandon Robinson and others
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2021cv05880
Plaintiff:
Horatio Hill
Defendant:
Rita Heard and Pace Suburban Bus Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Pace v. Pike County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv03225
Plaintiff:
Roger Pace
Defendant:
Pike County Jail and USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pace v. USP Marion
as 3:2021cv01281
Plaintiff:
Roger E. Pace
Defendant:
USP Marion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Crigler et al
as 1:2021cv02532
Defendant:
Lt. Witts, Officer Jordan, Head Warden Pflister and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
