Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PRICE et al v. PEARSON et al
as 1:2020cv00614
Defendant:
MICHAEL PEARSON, JOHN DOE, 3, ANTHONY GATON and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE PRICE and JEFFREY PRICE, SR.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORIDA EB5 INVESTMENTS, LLC v. WOLF et al
as 1:2019cv03573
Defendant:
CHAD WOLF, EDIE PEARSON and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA EB5 INVESTMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PEARSON v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
as 1:2019mc00170
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. PEARSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Counter Defendant:
PEARSON FAMILY MEMBERS FOUNDATION
Not Yet Classified:
ANNE RICHARD and GARY EDSON
PEARSON v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2019cv02576
Plaintiff:
Mr. ROY L. PEARSON, JR. and ROY L. PEARSON, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ELIZABETH (BETSY) DEVOS and ELISABETH DEVOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
SIRLEAF v. AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02522
Defendant:
AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02524
Defendant:
ARMOR HEALTH SERVICES, INC., SHAW, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. CLARKE et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS, D.Y. KINSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOOGLE, LLC
as 1:2019mc00129
Interested Party:
FREEMAN & WORTH PUBLISHING GROUP, LLC, MCGRAW-HILL GLOBAL EDUCATION HOLDINGS, LLC, ELSEVIER INC. and others
In Re:
GOOGLE, LLC
PRICE et al v. PEARSON et al
as 1:2019cv01272
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, 2, JOHN DOE, 3, MICHAEL PEARSON and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE PRICE and JEFFREY PRIC, Sr.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
