Cases 11 - 20 of 28
MACTRUONG et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
DMT MACTRUONG, NARAL PRO CHOICE AMERICA, KAMALA HARRIS and others
Defendant:
RONALD DESANTIS, WEBSTER BARNABY, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TURNBULL v. BIDEN et al
as 4:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A TURNBULL
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, NANCY PELOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. Pelosi et al
as 2:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Michael Flynn
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Bennie G. Thompson, Elizabeth L. Cheney and others
Flynn v. Pelosi et al
as 8:2021cv02956
Plaintiff:
Michael Flynn
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Bennie G. Thompson, Elizabeth L. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PELOSI et al
as 4:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C SMITH
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinker v. Johnson et al
as 8:2020cv02390
Defendant:
James Simons, Joseph Biden, Dawn Tinker and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela R Tinker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Scott v. Pelosi et al
as 0:2020cv61240
Defendant:
McCarthy, Schumer, Pelosi and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Liveal Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montenegro v. US Secret Service et al
as 1:2020cv20121
Defendant:
US Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Nancy Pelosi
Plaintiff:
Khriss Leonardo Montenegro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. TRUMP et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
