Cases 11 - 20 of 21
United States of America v. Phan et al
as 2:2015mc00122
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tuan Thanh Phan
Garnishee:
Hoffman Structures Inc
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. J.N. et al
as 2:2015cv01033
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
J.N. and Lechi T. Phan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Harris v. Nail Touch Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Hong Pham and Victoria Phan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hoang et al v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tu Hoang and Thu Phan
Defendant:
Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. , Stephen Routh , Jeffery Stenman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Tu Hoang and Thu Phan
Defendant:
Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., Stephen Routh, Jeffery Stenman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phan v. Nationwide Insurance Company of America
as 2:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Giovanny Phan
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phan v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01116
Petitioner:
Trung Dinh Phan
Respondent:
United States of America
Material_witne:
Kyana Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cong Ty Co Phan Kem Nghia v. Phuong Bui et al
as 2:2010cv01955
Plaintiff:
Cong Ty Co Phan Kem Nghia
Defendant:
Phuong Anh Bui and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Solis v. Tran et al
as 2:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
Dang D Tran and Huong Thi Phan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCarthy et al v. Barrett et al
as 3:2009cv05120
Plaintiff:
Thomas McCarthy, Phan Nguyen and Elizabeth Rivera Goldstein
Defendant:
James Barrett, Paul Jagodinski, Alan Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
